What is Insurance?

Learn more about insurance, where it began, and what policies will benefit you!

Health Insurance

Health Insurance is a must for a family. Learn more..

Life Insurance

Need to inquire more about Life Insurance policies and information? Check here.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Best & Worst Insurance Policies

Fear of the future sells insurance. Because we can't predict the future, we want to be ready to cover our financial needs if, or when, something bad happens. Insurance companies understand this fear and offer a variety of insurance policies designed to protect us from a host of calamities that range from disability to disease and everything in between. While none of us wants anything bad to happen, many of the potential catastrophes that happen in our lives are not worth insuring against. In this article, we'll take you through 15 policies that you're probably better off without.

More from Investopedia.com:

Extended Warranties: Should You Take The Bait?

9 Ways To Trim The Fat From Your Spending

10 Insurance Tips For Homeowners

1. Private Mortgage Insurance

The infamous private mortgage insurance (PMI) is well known to homeowners because it increases the amount of their monthly mortgage payments. PMI is an insurance policy that protects the lender against loss when lending to a higher-risk borrower. The borrower pays for this insurance but derives no benefit. Fortunately, there are several ways to avoid paying for this unnecessary policy. PMI is required if you purchase a home with a down payment of less than 20% of the home's value. The small down payment is viewed as putting you at risk of defaulting on the loan. Put down at least 20% and the PMI requirement goes away. Alternatively, you can put down 10% and take out two loans, one for 80% of the sale price of the property and one for 10%, although interests rates can prevent the economics of this maneuver from working out in the homeowner's favor.

More from Yahoo! Finance:

Most, Least Expensive States for Car Insurance

5 Things Never to Say to Your Insurers

Is This the Safest House in the World?

Visit the Insurance Center

2. Extended Warranties

Extended warranties are available on a host of appliances and electronics. From a consumer's perspective, they are rarely used, particularly on small items such as DVD players and radios. If you purchase a reputable, brand-name product, you can be fairly certain it will work as advertised and that the extended warranty is statistically likely to be unnecessary. If you spend $5,000 on a giant, flat-screen television, the policy is still unlikely to pay off, but might make you feel better. For everything else, forget it.

3. Automobile Collision

Collision insurance is designed to cover the cost of repairs to your vehicle if you are involved in an accident. If you have a loan out on the car, the loan issuer is likely to require that you have collision insurance. If your car is paid off, collision is optional; therefore, if you have enough money in the bank to cover the cost of a new car, collision insurance may be an unnecessary expense. This is particularly true if you are driving an old car, because cars depreciate so quickly that many vehicles are worth only a fraction of their purchase price by the time the loan is paid in full.

4. Rental Car Insurance

Most auto insurance policies offer additional coverage for the cost of car rentals, touting it as a useful feature if your car is ever involved in an accident and needs to spend some time in the repair shop. This may sound like a good idea, but in reality, most people rarely rent a car, and when they do, the cost is relatively low and hardly worth insuring against. Although rental car insurance is relatively inexpensive, amortized over the course of a lifetime you are still likely to spend far more than you will benefit.

5. Car Rental Damage Insurance

Many auto insurance policies already cover rentals, so there's no need to pay for this twice. Check your policy before you pay. Depending on where you rent the vehicle, you may also be able to pay a small fee for insurance on your rental when you pick it up at the rental center. If this fee is less than what you'd pay for a year in your old policy, choose the fee over the policy.

6. Flight Insurance

Flight insurance coverage is completely unnecessary. Despite media portrayal, airline accidents are relatively rare, and your life insurance policy should already provide coverage in the event of a catastrophe.

7. Water Line Coverage

Water companies have made an aggressive push to sell policies that cover the repair of the water line that runs from the street to your house. The odds are in your favor that you will never use this coverage, particularly if you live in a newer home. If you live an average suburban neighborhood and you do need to repair the water line, the distance to the street is short, the likelihood of a problem is low and repair costs are a few thousand dollars or less. The same goes for policies offered by other utility companies.

8. Life Insurance for Children

Life insurance is designed to provide a safety net for your heirs/dependents. Because children don't have heirs to worry about and, statistically speaking, most kids will grow up safe and healthy, most parents should not purchase life insurance for their kids. Instead, use the money that you would have spent on life insurance to fund an education plan or an individual retirement account (IRA).

9. Flood Insurance

Unless you live in a flood plain or an area with a history of water problems, don't even bother buying flood insurance. If none of the homes in the area has ever been flooded, yours is unlikely to be the first.

10. Credit Card Insurance

Purchasing coverage to pay your credit card bill in the event you cannot pay it is a waste of money. A far better idea is to avoid running up your credit cards in the first place, so you won't need to worry about the bills. Not only do you not save on the insurance premiums, you'll also save the interest on your debt.

11. Credit Card Loss Insurance

Federal law limits your liability if your credit card is stolen. Your out-of-pocket costs are limited to $50 per card and not a penny more. In fact, many credit card companies don't even try to collect the $50.

12. Mortgage Life Insurance

Mortgage life insurance pays off your house in the event of your death. Rather than add another policy - and another bill - to your list of insurance plans, it makes more sense to get a term-life policy instead. A good life insurance policy will provide enough money to pay off the mortgage and to cover other expenses as well. After all, the mortgage isn't the only bill your survivors will need to pay.

13. Unemployment Insurance

This coverage makes minimum payments on your bills if you are out of work, which sounds like an attractive proposition. A better plan is to save your money and build up an emergency fund instead. You won't have to cover the cost of the insurance policy and, if you are never out of work, you won't spend any money at all.

14. Disease Insurance

Policies are available to cover cancer, heart disease and other maladies. Instead of trying to identify every possible disease that you may encounter, get a good medical coverage policy instead. This way, your medical bills will be covered regardless of the problem you face.

15. Accidental-Death Insurance

Unless you are extraordinarily accident prone, an accident is unlikely. Major catastrophes such as car wrecks and fires are covered under other policies, as is any harm that comes to you while at work. Accidental-death policies are often fraught with stipulations that make them difficult to collect on, so skip the hassles and get life insurance instead.

When Choosing Insurance

There are so many policies to chose from, and they all cost money. While a certain amount of insurance coverage is necessary and prudent, you need to choose carefully. In general, broad policies that offer coverage for a multitude of potential events are a better choice than limited-scope policies that focus on specific diseases or potential incidents. Before you buy any policy, read it carefully to make sure that you understand the terms, coverage and costs. Don't sign on the dotted line until you are comfortable with the coverage and are sure that you need it.



Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/15-insurance-policies-dont-070000254.html

Monday, July 18, 2011

Life Insurance

Life insurance can protect your family and your assets. If you or your spouse should pass away, the right amount of life insurance coverage could allow surviving family members to pay off debts and maintain the same quality of life without having to sell investments or downsize your home.

Growing families mean growing life insurance needs

Many established families already have life insurance. A policy may have been purchased when a couple was newly married or upon the birth of their first child. For these families, the key isn't making sure life insurance is in place, it is ensuring that the family has the right level of coverage.

"Insurance needs increase because the standard of living increases," explains Marv Feldman, President and CEO of The Life and Health Insurance Foundation for Education (LIFE). "In many cases, these families have put themselves deeply in debt."

Feldman advises those with established families to remember that declining interest rates also impact life insurance needs. Generally speaking, families should anticipate investing the death benefit from a life insurance policy and drawing from the interest for regular living expenses. The capital should be preserved for emergencies or future needs. As interest rates decline, the death benefit should increase.

"Families should review numbers every year to every 18 months at a minimum," Feldman notes.

Term life insurance vs. permanent life insurance

Beyond the level of life insurance coverage, families must also determine whether to purchase term life insurance or permanent life. While permanent life, such as whole life insurance, provides guaranteed coverage so long as premiums are paid, term life offers temporary, less expensive financial protection.

The Minnesota Department of Commerce suggests that established families consider a combination of insurance coverage. According to the department, whole life insurance builds cash value that can be used for college tuition, while term life can be an inexpensive way to purchase the level of coverage needed to maintain a family's standard of living.

Feldman points out that determining the right level of coverage is important. Families should look at their cash flow to determine whether they can purchase the needed amount of coverage with term life, whole life or a combination of the two.




Source: http://www.compuquotes.com/categories/life-insurance/life-insurance-for-established-families.html

Health Insurace

(NaturalNews) Federal Judge Roger Vinson ruled this week that the "individual mandate" portion of Obama's health care reform was unconstitutional, dealing a significant blow to the Obama administration's desire to force government-run health insurance on the entire U.S. population. Department of Justice spokespeople reacted with a sense of twisted desperation, calling Judge Vinson's decision "judicial activism" as if he were inventing new law. In reality, of course, Judge Vinson merely ruled to protect existing law as written in the United States Constitution.

Three years ago, even President Obama would have agreed with Judge Vinson's decision. In arguing against the idea of an individual mandate in government-run health insurance, President Obama said in 2008, "If a mandate was the solution, we can try to solve homelessness by mandating everybody to buy a house."

Obama's quote demonstrates the ludicrousness of the federal government requiring people to buy certain products or services in order to solve what the government perceives as a problem. If the government is allowed to dictate commercial behavior by forcing citizens to purchase things they don't want to purchase, then it won't be long before Washington starts forcing everybody to buy a U.S.-made automobile each year to support the auto industry... or pharmaceuticals, vaccines, and other products and services the government wants to push onto the people.

Judge Vinson cited this same argument in his 78-page ruling, in fact, writing:

"Congress could require that everyone above a certain income threshold buy a General Motors automobile -- now partially government-owned -- because those who do not buy GM cars (or those who buy foreign cars) are adversely impacting commerce and a taxpayer-subsidized business."

In a demonstration of the ridiculousness of governments forcing citizens to buy things, five South Dakota lawmakers have introduced legislation that would require all residents of that state to buy a firearm to provide for their own self defense. (http://www.argusleader.com/article/...)

The bill is, of course, being put forth solely to make a point: That governments have no business forcing citizens to buy things they don't personally want or even believe in.

But if Obama can force you to buy health insurance, there's no reason why someone else in Washington couldn't force everybody to buy a firearm, or a pound of broccoli each week, or a water filter, or anything else the government says is "for your own good."

The federal government has no power to force Americans to buy stuff

In light of the potential for runaway federal abuse of the Commerce Clause, Judge Roger Vinson correctly ruled that the U.S. Constitution does not grant the federal government the power to engage in "market dictatorship" activities such as requiring people to buy health insurance. Such power was never granted to the federal government in the U.S. Constitution (no, not even in the Commerce Clause, which was written to prevent states from enacting tariffs, not to grant the federal government power over all commerce), and therefore the federal government has no legal basis from which to enforce such mandates.

Congress, of course, rarely abides by the limitations on federal power as enumerated in the U.S. Constitution. That's why Congress passed Obamacare in the first place, even though the law blatantly violated the Constitution in requiring people to purchase a product many of them were ethically opposed to purchasing. (How many of us really want to be forced by Washington to send money to Big Pharma and the conventional medical industry?)

Congress, it seems, wants the federal government to essentially be able to have absolute power over the American people; to tell them what to buy, how they're supposed to react to tragedy (Giffords shooting), and even what they're not allowed to read (health claims on nutritional products). And yet, the primary purpose of the U.S. Constitution is to place limits on federal power, and it is the proper role of federal judges to strike down laws when such laws clearly attempt to undermine the Constitution by engaging in unjustified expansions of federal power.

On to the Supreme Court

The ultimate legality of Obama's health care law will, of course, be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, and it's anyone's guess how the Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of the individual mandate (or the law in its entirety). Through American history, the U.S. Supreme Court has made some rather wild and seemingly-irrational decisions that supported federal government's power grabs, such as the case of Wickard vs Filburn as we reported here on NaturalNews: http://www.naturalnews.com/030799_f...

At other times, the U.S. Supreme Court has limited the power of the federal government in the context of the Commerce Clause. It seems that the high court's decisions in these matters rest on whether it believes the federal government has "a compelling interest" in the matter which would, in the opinion of the Court, justify what is obviously the federal government's attempt to establish vast overreaching powers that would intrude upon individual liberties.

This case may not even be heard until 2012, and until that time, Obamacare rolls forward, causing steady increases in health insurance premiums and an ongoing loss of jobs as U.S. corporations move their operations to other countries where health care mandates don't bankrupt them. In order to protect its favorite corporations and unions, of course, the Obama Administration has now granted over 700 waivers to various business organizations (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...). Recipients of the waivers include PepsiCo and various unions.

This brings up the obvious question: Obamacare is so good that Americans have to be forced to buy it while PepsiCo -- a company whose products actually contribute to health care costs in America through obesity and diabetes -- is exempted from participating? How is it that powerful corporations are getting waivers from such a "great" health care system, but individuals get a knock on the door from the IRS if they try to opt out?

This is how tyrannical governments work: They pass oppressive, overreaching mandates and then exempt their own buddies and corporate supporters from any such requirements. Everyday working people, meanwhile, are locked in and actually penalized by tax authorities if they try to avoid buying a health insurance product they never even wanted in the first place!

Efforts under way to repeal Obamacare in the Senate

So far, 26 states have filed suit against the federal government to halt Obamacare. They're doing this because Obamacare threatens to bankrupt the states. These states are, in essence, fighting for their financial survival.

Anticipating the devastating financial consequences on states if Obamacare remains law, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell announced yesterday that he plans to attach an Obamacare repeal effort to an upcoming funding bill that's pending in the Senate. This effort reportedly has the support of all 47 Republican senators.

Any such attempt to repeal Obamacare, of course, is almost certain to be vetoed by President Obama. The federal government is fighting hard to force the American people -- and the states -- to accept this Washington power grab that actually feeds right into the monopolistic (and health-harming) business practices of the conventional medical industry, Big Pharma, the vaccine industry and even the cancer industry.

Obamacare care is, in effect, the law that guarantees a Big Pharma medical monopoly by forcing people to financially support it even if they would rather support natural medicine or the healing arts.

Yet another reason for the states to distance themselves from Washington

In the end, I believe this issue will provide yet more justification for states to consider distancing themselves from Washington's runaway power grab efforts. When the federal government attempts to enact measures that will financially ruin the states, those states have little choice but to reject and nullify such federal mandates.

That's exactly what we're seeing right now with the rapid growth of the Tenth Amendment Center (www.TenthAmendmentCenter.com) and its efforts to encourage states to protect themselves from the financially and ethically bankrupt policies of Washington.

States have the power to simply say NO to Washington and refuse to implement unconstitutional laws, especially when those laws would cause financial devastation. In fact, it is not merely a state's right to resist such tyrannical laws, but a state's duty to resist. This is why the Tenth Amendment clearly spells out, in plain language, that those powers not granted to the federal government are reserved for the states or the People. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_...)

Nowhere in the Constitution was the federal government given the power to force the American people to buy health insurance, or automobiles, or vaccines, or pharmaceuticals for that matter. Washington's attempt to force the American people to make purchases they do not wish to make is un-American at its core, and almost certainly illegal as well.

Might does not make right. Even while Washington attempts to bully states into accepting this ill-considered law, those states are increasingly resisting it out of a sense of financial sanity if nothing else. Those states that wish to go along with every loony idea that comes out of Washington will, in due time, suffer the same fate as the federal government itself: Outright bankruptcy followed by serious political destabilization.

Remember: You cannot force people to buy health insurance they don't want and often don't need. And you can't stick a high-dollar IRS fine in someone's face and tell them they're free if they don't "voluntarily" buy into the government's health insurance scheme. Freedom means we have a choice, and the Obama administration doesn't want Americans to have a choice on this matter.

They want Americans to basically sit down, shut up, and do what they're told. As even Egyptian dictator Mubarak is learning all of a sudden, ruling over a country is a whole lot easier when people don't fight back.

Monday, July 4, 2011

What is Insurance?

Insurance is a form of risk management in which the insured transfers the cost of potential loss to another entity in exchange for monetary compensation known as the premium. (For background reading, see The History Of Insurance In America.)

Insurance allows individuals, businesses and other entities to protect themselves against significant potential losses and financial hardship at a reasonably affordable rate. We say "significant" because if the potential loss is small, then it doesn't make sense to pay a premium to protect against the loss. After all, you would not pay a monthly premium to protect against a $50 loss because this would not be considered a financial hardship for most.

Insurance is appropriate when you want to protect against a significant monetary loss. Take life insurance as an example. If you are the primary breadwinner in your home, the loss of income that your family would experience as a result of our premature death is considered a significant loss and hardship that you should protect them against. It would be very difficult for your family to replace your income, so the monthly premiums ensure that if you die, your income will be replaced by the insured amount. The same principle applies to many other forms of insurance. If the potential loss will have a detrimental effect on the person or entity, insurance makes sense. (For more insight, see 15 Insurance Policies You Don't Need.)

Everyone that wants to protect themselves or someone else against financial hardship should consider insurance. This may include:

  • Protecting family after one's death from loss of income
  • Ensuring debt repayment after death
  • Covering contingent liabilities
  • Protecting against the death of a key employee or person in your business
  • Buying out a partner or co-shareholder after his or her death
  • Protecting your business from business interruption and loss of income
  • Protecting yourself against unforeseeable health expenses
  • Protecting your home against theft, fire, flood and other hazards
  • Protecting yourself against lawsuits
  • Protecting yourself in the event of disability
  • Protecting your car against theft or losses incurred because of accidents
  • And many more


- Source -
http://www.investopedia.com/university/insurance/insurance1.asp#axzz1RC9QxfxO

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More